Donald Trump, The Epstein Files, and “60 Minutes”

Fans of ‘Sesame Street” will remember this song:

“One of these things is not like the others. One of these things just doesn’t belong. Can you say which thing is not like the others before I finish my song?”

On “Sesame Street,” three vegetables and a fruit might appear on the screen, or perhaps three birds and a fish. The challenge for pre-schoolers is to identify the outlier, the object that clearly did not belong in the group.

However, in the case of Donald Trump, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and “60 Minutes,” the three do belong together because the curious, controversial, and largely unexamined relationship betweenTrump and Epstein stretches back more than 35 years. Recently “60 Minutes” had a 90-minute interview with Mr. Trump, the perfect opportunity to ask him why the Epstein Files haven’t been released.

So, of course, any journalist worth his/her salt would have to ask Trump about the Epstein Files. Except the “60 Minutes” Correspondent Nora O’Donnell did not.

O’Donnell asked Mr. Trump more than 70 questions, several of them more than once, but she never asked Trump about the Epstein Files.

How newsworthy are the Epstein Files? Well, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson shut down the House on September 19th and sent members home for more than six weeks, rather than risk a floor vote on releasing the Epstein Files. He has refused to swear in a duly-elected Representative from Arizona because he knows she will vote to release the files, and that might be enough to pass the resolution.

Johnson is, of course, protecting President Trump. But was O’Donnell protecting him? And, if so, why?

It’s possible that she and her bosses at “60 Minutes” agreed in advance not to bring up the Epstein Files. We may never know, but one passage in the extended interview indicates the existence of some sort of agreement. What do you make of this interchange, toward the end of the session?

NORAH O’DONNELL: Do I have the opportunity to ask you two more questions?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: If you want, if it helps–

NORAH O’DONNELL: Okay. Okay. Two more questions–

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: That means they’ll treat me more fairly if I do– I want to get– It’s very nice, yeah. Now is good. Okay. Uh, oh. These might be the ones I didn’t want. I don’t know. Okay, go ahead.

“These might be the ones I didn’t want,” Mr. Trump blurted out. Is it reasonable to infer that CBS and Trump’s people had an agreement?

A few minutes later, this interchange took place:

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: I can’t say, because– I can’t say– I’m not concerned. I don’t– I’d rather not have you ask the question. But I let you ask it. You just came to me and you said, “Can I ask another question?” And I said, yeah. This is the question–

NORAH O’DONNELL: And you answered–

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: I don’t mind. Did I let you do it? I coulda walked away. I didn’t have to answer this question. I’m proud to answer the question.

It’s important to note that “Off limits” is not inherently wrong. An interviewer might agree in advance to not ask questions about the subject’s personal life, marriage, children, and so forth. But under no circumstances should a journalist ever agree to avoid controversial (and potentially embarrassing) subjects.

If that means not getting the interview, so be it. And maybe that becomes a story in itself!

The full transcript of the Trump-O’Donnell interview consists of 18,567 words, of which I’d estimate that at least 15,000 were uttered by the President. He blusters, he talks over O’Donnell, and he lies about the rate of inflation, the 2020 Presidential election, and the wars he has stopped, among other things. She doesn’t fight him on these, but that’s more understandable and even forgivable than not asking about the Epstein Files, because Trump is a steamroller who ignores whatever he chooses to.

In the interview Trump mentions former President Joe Biden 42 times, often modifying his name with the adjective ‘worst.’ That obsession probably deserved a question from O’Donnell, but that didn’t happen either.

(Incidentally, Laura Ingraham, not a journalist but a Fox commentator with her own nightly program, recently interviewed Mr. Trump. Again, no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or the Epstein Files, but it wouldn’t surprise me if she agreed to whatever conditions Trump’s people demanded.)

I learned the hard way about interviewing politicians. It was late in 1974, and I had just been given my own program on National Public Radio. Because I was focusing on education, my producer suggested an hour about Pell Grants, the federal government’s program of financial assistance for low income college students. “Interview Senator Claiborne Pell, the force behind the Pell Grants,” he suggested, and so I called up the Senator’s office to request an interview. “Sure,” an aide told me. “Just send over the questions.” Because I hadn’t studied journalism and was new to Washington, I didn’t know enough to refuse that request. I wrote up some questions and faxed them over. When I showed up to interview the distinguished Democrat, he simply read off the answers to my questions. I’m not sure he ever even made eye contact!

Here’s the lesson: whenever the person you want to interview wants to keep some subjects off limits, or wants your questions in advance, the only response is some polite form of NFW.

“60 Minutes” was once the flagship of CBS News and (with the PBS NewsHour and “Frontline”) a gold standard of American journalism, but it seems to have sold its soul.

The so-called ‘Main Stream Media’ has lots to answer for in its failure to hold (first Candidate and then President) Trump to account for his lies, and in its failure to question the mental acuity of President Biden. This is, I think, the final straw. “60 Minutes,” RIP…..

RANKING DONALD J. TRUMP

“Readers love lists.  Whenever you can, build your column around a list.” 

Tina Brown, the brilliant editor of The Daily Beast and, before that, The New Yorker, gave me that advice while we were sitting in her Daily Beast office overlooking the Hudson River.  That was 20 years ago, and I was too immature–only 63!–to embrace the wisdom, but I realize now that she was correct.  

And so here’s a column with not one but THREE lists, and an opportunity for readers to rank the current occupant of The  White House on three aspects of his character and behavior: Greed, Narcissism, and Business Acumen.

(Scoring: Give Trump the points that correspond with your ranking.  IE, if you rank Trump the second-greediest person in history, he gets TWO points. Third most narcissistic, he gets THREE points. Worst businessman ever, ONE point.  Lowest total score wins!) 

Let’s start with greed or avarice.  Below are short descriptions (in alphabetical order) of 10 greedy people from human history. Where would you rank Donald Trump?

  1. Caligula, the Roman Emperor, is infamous for his tyrannical and extravagant reign, driven by greed and madness. His rule was marked by excessive spending and cruel demands.  Caligula’s desire for wealth led to heavy taxation and confiscation of property, causing public unrest. His erratic behavior and lavish projects drained the empire’s resources.
  2. Marcus Licinius Crassus was a Roman general and politician known for his immense wealth and insatiable greed. He became obsessed with wealth as a young man. He rented land and bought slaves to sell later on for profit. Rome’s failure to provide housing fueled his business. He organized teams of firefighters who would save the burning houses (fires were quite common) and then buy them cheap so he could rebuild them and rent them. He had a net worth of $2 Trillion in today’s money. 
  3. Hetty Green, known as the “Witch of Wall Street,” was one of the wealthiest women of her time. Her frugality and aggressive investment strategies earned her a reputation for greed and shrewdness. Green amassed a vast fortune through real estate and railroads, often lending money at high interest rates. Her financial decisions were marked by extreme thrift and an unyielding focus on profit.
  4. Leona Helmsley, dubbed the “Queen of Mean,” was an American businesswoman known for her opulent lifestyle and notorious greed. Her harsh management style and tax evasion convictions marked her career…Her downfall came with her conviction for tax evasion, exposing her lavish spending and disdain for the law. Helmsley’s story is a testament to the consequences of greed and the importance of integrity in business leadership.
  5. Leopold II of Belgium amassed a $500,000,000 fortune from his rubber plantations in Congo. In the process he killed some 8 million people and maimed uncountable men, women and children. He did not kill for pleasure or political/military gains. He did not kill with guns and swords. He killed for profit, and killed with overwork, hunger and punishment (his favourite was chopping off the hands of child-workers when they failed to meet inhuman work production requirements).
  6. Bernie Madoff was an American financier who orchestrated the largest Ponzi scheme in history, defrauding thousands of investors of billions of dollars. His greed and deception shattered lives and financial institutions.  Madoff’s reputation as a trusted financier concealed his fraudulent operations for decades. 
  7. Imelda Marcos, the former First Lady of the Philippines, became infamous for her extravagant lifestyle and accumulation of wealth. Her collection of shoes and lavish spending symbolized her greed. Marcos wielded significant influence during her husband’s regime, using her position to amass personal fortune and power. Her opulent lifestyle was funded by embezzled public funds and corruption.
  8. Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar ruled Madagascar with an iron fist from 1828 to 1861. Her greed for power and wealth was evident in her harsh policies and isolationist stance. Ranavalona’s regime was marked by forced labor and heavy taxation, which enriched her court but impoverished her subjects. Her ruthless approach to governance ensured her control over Madagascar, but at a significant cost to her people. Despite her reputation for cruelty, she maintained power for over three decades, leaving a legacy of greed and tyranny that still resonates in Madagascar’s history.
  9. Cecil Rhodes was a British imperialist known for his exploitation of African resources and people. His insatiable greed fueled colonial expansion in southern Africa, leading to the establishment of Rhodesia. Rhodes’ pursuit of wealth was driven by diamond mining, which he monopolized through De Beers.
  10. John D. Rockefeller, an American industrialist, became the richest man in modern history through the establishment of Standard Oil. His relentless pursuit of wealth led to monopolistic practices that crushed competitors and controlled the oil industry.

(Contemporary nominees include Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and Charles Koch.)

Where would you put Trump on that list?  Here’s his own assessment: 

My whole life I’ve been greedy, greedy, greedy. I’ve grabbed all the money I could get. I’m so greedy. But now I want to be greedy for the United States. I want to grab all that money. I’m going to be greedy for the United States.

You have to admire how Trump takes a very negative quality and turns it to his political advantage. He always makes it about himself….which is a perfect segue to Narcissism, and another list: The World’s Worst Narcissists. First, a definition:  Narcissists, who have an inflated sense of self-importance, rarely think about others but instead prioritize their own needs and desires. 

Here’s a list of ten candidates (in alphabetical order) for “History’s Worst Narcissist.”

  1. Ted Bundy was an American serial killer and a psychopath who was convicted of killing more than thirty people, most of them young women. He was a manipulative, extremely self-centered, and charismatic man who loved attention and limelight.
  2. Cleopatra, the last active ruler of the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, is often characterized as a narcissist, particularly in her pursuit of power and dramatic life choices.
  3. Adolf Hitler, the Nazi politician who started World War II, slaughtered 6 million Jews and many other innocent people in his goal of establishing white Germans as the superior race.
  4. Jim Jones was an American cult leader and a preacher who persuaded more than nine hundred followers to accompany him to Guyana. There he forced his followers to drink poison in the name of spirituality. Those who declined to commit suicide were murdered.
  5. Kim Jong Un, the North Korean dictator, is known as a brutal and self-obsessed leader.  North Korean citizens are required to worship him as their leader, and do so out of terror and fright. 
  6. Kim Kardashian is a businesswoman, media personality, and model who relentlessly promotes herself, her wealth, and her pompousness publically. 
  7. Madonna, the American singer, actress, and songwriter, is known for her exploitative behavior towards her employees and staff members by making unreasonable and unfair demands. She is known for abusing her employees by making them work unreasonably long hours.
  8. King Louis XIV of France, known as The “Sun King,” was infamous for his extravagant lifestyle and his firm belief in his divine right to rule, emphasizing his grandeur and importance. “L’etat c’est moi,” he is said to have pronounced.
  9. Elon Musk: The CEO of X, Tesla and, SpaceX is often considered a modern-day narcissist due to his self-promoting behavior and controversial public statements.
  10. Joseph Stalin, the Soviet dictator, exhibited many traits associated with narcissism, including a cult of personality, paranoia, and a ruthless pursuit of power.

Is Donald Trump a textbook narcissist?  He is said to have almost all the traits that a narcissist might possess. He only cares about his personal needs, dismissing the needs of his family members; he is thin-skinned when it comes to criticism. He promotes himself above the needs of the nation, while sidetracking or ignoring his Constitutional responsibilities as President.

And, finally, the worst business leaders of all time.  Here are 10 candidates, again in alphabetical order

  1. John Akers – IBM  Under John Akers’ leadership in the late 1980s and early 1990s, IBM encountered significant challenges adapting to the rapidly evolving technology landscape. Akers’ inability to foresee the shift from mainframe to personal computing led to a loss of market share and financial stability for IBM. By 1992, the company reported an unprecedented annual loss of $8 billion, marking a significant downturn from its previous market dominance. 
  2. Leo Apotheker – Hewlett-Packard (HP): Leo Apotheker’s brief tenure as CEO of HP in 2011 was characterized by a series of strategic missteps that significantly impacted the company’s market position and shareholder value. His decisions to discontinue HP’s smartphone and tablet lines and the announcement of plans to spin off its lucrative PC business potentially caused confusion and uncertainty among investors, customers, and employees alike. These moves, along with the costly acquisition of Autonomy for $11 billion—a decision later mired in controversy over allegations of financial misrepresentation—resulted in a sharp decline in HP’s stock price and a loss of confidence in the company’s strategic direction. 
  3. Steven Ballmer – Microsoft: Steven Ballmer’s tenure as CEO of Microsoft from 2000 to 2014 was marked by financial success but also significant strategic oversights, particularly in mobile computing and internet services. Despite maintaining profitability and growing revenues, Microsoft, under Ballmer’s leadership, failed to capitalize on the early stages of the mobile revolution and the rise of search engines like Google, allowing competitors to dominate these critical market segments.
  4. Carly Fiorina – Hewlett-Packard (HP): Carly Fiorina’s leadership at HP was marked by bold decisions, most notably the contentious acquisition of Compaq in 2002 for $25 billion. This move was intended to solidify HP’s position in the personal computing market but instead led to significant internal and external turmoil. 
  5. Fred Goodwin – Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS): Fred Goodwin’s leadership of RBS is often cited as a prime example of the dangers of overexpansion and the risks associated with high-stakes acquisitions. His aggressive pursuit of growth led RBS to acquire ABN Amro in 2007 for approximately £49 billion, just before the global financial crisis. This acquisition stretched RBS’s financial resources thin and exposed the bank to significant risks, contributing to its near-collapse and the largest bailout in British history, costing taxpayers around £45 billion. 
  6. Elizabeth Holmes – Theranos: Elizabeth Holmes promised to revolutionize the healthcare industry with Theranos’ technology, which claimed to perform comprehensive blood tests with just a few drops of blood. However, investigative journalism and regulatory scrutiny revealed that the technology was fundamentally flawed and incapable of producing accurate results. Holmes’ ambition led to over $700 million in investor losses and a criminal conviction for her.
  7. Ron Johnson – J.C. Penney: Ron Johnson’s attempt to transform J.C. Penney’s retail strategy was bold and forward-thinking but ultimately disconnected from the reality of the company’s customer base and market position. By eliminating coupons and sales in favor of everyday low prices and rebranding stores with an upscale flair, Johnson alienated long-time customers without attracting a new clientele. This misalignment led to a 25% drop in sales in his first year alone, a loss from which the company never recovered.
  8. Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling – Enron: The Enron scandal, masterminded by CEO Kenneth Lay and COO turned CEO Jeffrey Skilling, represents one of the most dramatic collapses in corporate America. Their use of off-the-books special purpose vehicles (SPVs) to conceal debts and artificially inflate the company’s stock price not only misled investors but also compromised the integrity of the financial reporting system. The fallout from Enron’s bankruptcy in 2001 was profound, leading to the loss of thousands of jobs, the erasure of $74 billion for shareholders, and the dissolution of the Arthur Andersen accounting firm.
  9. Bob Nardelli – Home Depot: Bob Nardelli’s tenure at Home Depot is often criticized for prioritizing cost-cutting and operational efficiency at the expense of customer service and employee satisfaction. His focus on centralizing operations and reducing staff levels deteriorated the company’s core competency of knowledgeable and friendly customer service. This approach, coupled with his autocratic leadership style, decreased employee morale and customer loyalty. 
  10. Martin Winterkorn – Volkswagen: Under Martin Winterkorn’s leadership, Volkswagen became embroiled in one of the largest scandals in automotive history. The “Dieselgate” scandal, involving the manipulation of emissions tests through software installed in diesel engines, highlighted a failure in ethical leadership and a systemic issue within the company’s pursuit of market dominance. The scandal resulted in over $30 billion in fines and settlements and a significant tarnish on Volkswagen’s reputation for reliability and trustworthiness.

Where does Donald Trump, with five bankruptcies, a failed airline, a failed professional football team, a failed on-line university and so on, rank?  His less-than-admirable track record of 15 or more failures, include these four: 

  1. Trump Airlines — Trump borrowed $245 million to purchase Eastern Air Shuttle. He branded it Trump Airlines. He added gold bathroom fixtures. Two years later Trump could not cover the interest payment on his loan and defaulted. 
  2. Trump Beverages — Although Trump touted his water as “one of the purest natural spring waters bottled in the world,” it was simply bottled by a third party. Other beverages, including Trump Fire and Trump Power, seem not to have made it to market. And Trump’s American Pale Ale died with a trademark withdrawal. 
  3. Trump Game — Milton Bradley tried to sell it. As did Hasbro. After investment, the game died and went out of circulation. 
  4. Trump Casinos — Trump filed for bankruptcy three times on his casinos, namely the Trump Taj Mahal, the Trump Marina and the Trump Plaza in New Jersey and the Trump Casino in Indiana. Trump avoided debt obligations of $3 billion the first time. Then $1.8 billion the second time. And then after reorganizing, shuffling money and assets, and waiting four years, Trump again declared bankruptcy after missing ongoing interest payments on multi-million dollar bonds. He was finally forced to step down as chairman. .

So where does Donald Trump rank among the worst business leaders of all time?  Please  tally up your results, and, if you want to share, post your scores here.

“IF YOU’VE EVER WONDERED…….

“If you’ve wondered what you would have done if you’d lived in Nazi Germany during Hitler’s rise to power, it’s what you are doing right now.”

That’s not the exact quote, but I heard something like that the other day, and it struck home.  It’s actually  not a new thought: On Twitter I found this version from 2017, substituting “Slavery” or “the Civil Rights Movement” for “Nazi Germany,” but the point remains: What am I doing in this moment of crisis? What are you doing? What else can we do?

Well, here’s something that you can do immediately: Write the presidents of every academic institution you have a connection to and urge them to stand tall in the face of despotism.

Something like: 

Dear President XXXX,

As a proud (College or University) graduate, I urge you to join Harvard and stand firmly against the Trump Administration’s all out assault on the fundamental pillars of American society, including academic freedom. I hope that (college name) and other elite institutions will lead the effort to rebuild our democratic republic.  

I am approaching my XXth birthday and never have I been so afraid for my country.  As someone wisely observed, “If you ever wondered what you would have done if you had lived in Nazi Germany in the late 1930’s, it’s what you are doing right now.”  I believe that is correct. 

Thank you for your leadership, 

The New York Times columnist David Brooks, a lifelong conservative, has other suggestions, and I urge you to read his thoughtful piece.  He makes it clear that it’s not enough to be against Trump and Trumpism; we must also stand with equal fervor and purpose for a just society that provides fair opportunities for all.  And he makes clear that this is not a Democrat, Independent, or Republican issue. This is what all Americans must do to save our country from a power-hungry despot and his enablers.

What’s YOUR ‘Side Hustle’?

“Tell me what human behavior dogs pay the most attention to,” said the man we had hired to train our newly rescued dog.   “Our tone of voice,” I answered, while my wife said she thought it might be body language.  “It’s body language,” he said. “Dogs are acutely aware of how you stand, how you move, and how you look at them. That’s more important than your tone of voice.  It’s true for dogs, and it’s also true for my middle school students,” he said, smiling.

“What, wait.  You’re a teacher?” I blurted.  He smiled.  “Eighteen years and counting. Training dogs–training their owners, actually–that’s my side hustle.”

He’s not alone in having a side hustle.  Somewhere between 33 and 40 percent of adult Americans have second,  part-time paying jobs. As the economic picture darkens and the price of food and other essential goods rises, more of us may be seeking side hustles.  (Another five per cent of the labor force–nearly 9,000,000 Americans–are holding down two full time jobs.) 

The term our dog trainer used, “side hustle,” may sound kind of sneaky, but it’s an honorable term for a second source of income.  Your Uber, Lyft, or DoorDash drivers may be on their side hustle, driving during their free time to make ends meet.  A few months ago at dinner, we discovered that our waitress taught Second Grade during the day; waiting tables was her side hustle.   When I mentioned side hustles to someone on Martha’s Vineyard, (MA), where I live, he became exasperated. “Just about everyone I know on this island has at least one part-time job, maybe two, because otherwise it’s impossible to make ends meet.”  That’s apparently true across most of the United States, as the income gap widens, because the number of people holding down second jobs has reached levels not seen since the ‘Great Recession’ of 2009.

Not surprisingly, well-to-do Americans have their own variation of the side hustle: Investments.  Doctors, lawyers, business executives, and other white-collar workers rarely have to hold down part-time jobs, because their side hustle is Wall Street.  About 60% of households with 6-figure incomes own stocks and bonds, a second source of support which doesn’t require any heavy lifting.

A few side hustles seem to grow naturally from one’s day job. For example, when I was reporting on public education for PBS and NPR, my (modest) presence on air led to invitations to speak, for (modest) amounts of money.  

However, most side hustles are opportunistic, not organic.  People do what they have to do to support themselves and their families.  

Some side hustles are illegal and/or unethical. Here’s one example: Recently my wife and I returned from Miami to LaGuardia Airport in New York City. Because of Elon Musk’s Starship rocket explosion, our flight was delayed and did not land until 4AM. When I asked the cab driver what the fare would be, he said, “If you pay cash, it’s $60.” He then proceeded to drive into Manhattan on the only route that is toll-free. Exhausted though I was, I noticed that the meter was off, so his side hustle was a fare that his Yellow Cab company would never learn about.

Most side hustles are legal.  When we visited Cuba in February, literally everyone we spoke with had some sort of side hustle.  The coffee farmers we met were required to sell 90% of their raw beans to the Cuban government, but the 10% they were allowed to keep sometimes amounted to 13 or 14%, we were told. They roasted those beans and sold them at their home and a roadside stand. They welcomed visitors like us, and we bought their products.  Our guide had his own side hustle, flying to Miami or Mexico City at least once a month with a list of auto parts he knew he could sell–at a profit.  (Half of his side hustle may now be history, because the Trump administration has banned Cubans from traveling to the US.)

We found a striking example of a side hustle at a state-owned cigar factory in Havana, where workers hand-rolled anywhere from 100 to 135 Cuban cigars every day, five days a week.  For this work, they were paid only 10,000 pesos, approximately $30, but they also participated in a state-sponsored side hustle: Each worker got 5 hand-rolled Cuban cigars a day to take home.  On our way into the factory, someone offered me 5 cigars for $30, and the same thing happened on the way out.  Those would-be sellers, our guide told us, were cigar rollers on their break. In short, they work 20 days a month for $30 and 100 cigars, meaning their side hustle can bring in an additional $600.  That’s unusual, because most side hustles provide supplemental income, not the lion’s share.  Apparently the Cuban government is tacitly acknowledging that its system of socialist control does not work, and it’s making adjustments to try to stay in power.

One  job whose very nature would seem to preclude having a side hustle is that of President of the United States, whose responsibility it is to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”  While that ought to be an all-consuming job, the current occupant of the White House turns out to have something in common with those Cuban cigar rollers: his side hustles rake in a lot more money than his day job.  Although we pay him $400,000 a year, he pulled in an estimated $9.2 million last year from bitcoin transfers, from business executives eager to meet with him, from Secret Service payments to his hotels when he’s golfing, diplomatic payments to his properties, and on and on.  The ‘Donald J. Trump for President’ Committee spent more than$5 million at his hotels.  This isn’t new, of course: During his first term, it’s estimated that his side hustles brought in nearly $14 million, and, when his family is included, the estimate jumps to a staggering $160 million.

But unlike Donald Trump, the Cuban cigar rollers are doing the job they were hired to do. By contrast, the current President of the United States seems to spend most of his working hours posting on his Truth Social app, holding court with fawning admirers, or playing golf.  

And unlike Trump, those Cuban cigar rollers are held accountable. They close their jobs if they don’t perform. He, on the other hand, is paying scant attention to our Constitution–by law his main job–but is not being held to account.

What’s wrong with this picture?

WAVING THE FLAG

Before all thoughts of the recent celebration of our nation’s independence fade away, it’s worth recalling that our National Anthem, “The Star-Spangled Banner,” poses two questions but answers only the first, leaving the second for each generation to wrestle with.

You may be surprised to learn about the questions, because the song is never sung in a questioning, challenging way; instead, it’s broadly nationalistic, even jingoistic.  (And you may be surprised to learn that the man who sang the praises of  ‘the land of the free’ was a slave owner.  More about that later.)

I’ve seen data that two-thirds of Americans do know the words to our National Anthem, but perhaps you remember the first four lines, the ones that pose the first question: 

O, say can you see by the dawn’s early light 

What so proudly we hail’d at the twilight’s last gleaming, 

Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight 

O’er the ramparts we watch’d were so gallantly streaming? 

In other words, the song’s writer, Francis Scott Key, is asking whether our flag survived the night-long bombardment of Fort McHenry in what is known as the Battle of Baltimore in September, 1814, toward the end of the War of 1812. 

Key, a well-known 34-year-old Washington, D.C., lawyer and poet, actually witnessed the battle from a British ship.  “The British had captured Washington and taken William Beanes, a physician, prisoner. They were holding him aboard a ship in their fleet off the Baltimore shore. Friends of Beanes persuaded Key to negotiate his release. Key went out to the British fleet and succeeded in gaining Beanes’ release but, because the British planned to attack Baltimore at that time, both were detained. During the night of Sept. 13-14, Key watched the bombardment of Baltimore from the deck of a British ship. Although rain obscured the fort during the night, at daybreak he could see the American flag still flying from Fort McHenry. The fort still stood after the British had fired some 1,800 bombs, rockets and shells at it, about 400 of them landing inside. Four defenders were killed and 24 wounded. Key drafted the words of a poem on an envelope. The American detainees were sent ashore, the British fleet withdrew, and Key finished the poem and made a good copy of it in a Baltimore hotel the next day.” 

It was still flying, Key’s next couplet assures us:

And the rocket’s red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.

However, Key then poses a second question–critical then and perhaps even more so today–in the last two lines of the first stanza:

O, say does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

Most of us do not think of it as a question, probably because the performers who lead us in song never present it as a matter of doubt. We sing it, loudly and proudly, telling the world that we are the land of the free and the home of the brave. But Key wrote it as a question, not an exclamation. So let’s ask Key’s question–but about the America we live in now.

Is it accurate to describe America as ‘the land of the free’ when 27.3% of Black, non-Hispanic children, 22.4% of Hispanic children, and 8.8% of white children are growing up in poverty? Is everyone free in ‘the land of the free’ when the top 10% of households hold 67% of wealth, while the bottom 50% possess only 3%? Are we all free when white families have six times the average wealth of Black families and Hispanic families?

How free are we when politicians in dozens of states have maneuvered to keep groups of people from voting, when millions of college graduates are in debt, and when millions more leave college without a diploma but with a heavy debt burden?

Are we truly ‘the land of the free’ when millions of Americans are in thrall to political leaders who celebrate the January 6th, 2021, attack on the Capitol?  Those duplicitous men and women seem ignorant of the fact that the January 6th insurrection was only the second such attack in our nation’s entire history, the British having captured Washington during the War of 1812. 

Can we call America ‘the land of the brave’ when we no longer call on our young people to serve but rely instead on a professional military–the brave men and women whom our leaders send, over and over and over, to serve tours of duty in hostile environments but then fail to provide for when they return home–while most of the rest of us happily ‘thank them for their service’ by singing our National Anthem?

I suggest we think about how we seem to be losing what we prize. Is the America envisioned in ‘The Star-Spangled Banner’ slipping away because we lack the lift of a driving dream?  Because we ask almost nothing of our young people…and very little of ourselves?

Could it be time to revive the idea of national service and reinstate the military draft?  What if all young people–men and women–were obligated to give two years of their lives in service to our country? Serving in the military should be just one of a menu of options. In return, we taxpayers would commit to paying for two years of post-secondary education or training for young people after they serve.  National service would be a great leveler, because no one could avoid dealing with people different from themselves.

Let’s also encourage the study of ‘The Star–Spangled Banner’ in high school, because it is, after all, an important primary document of our nation. What does it mean that Key was an abolitionist who owned slaves, a man who professed to hate slavery but did nothing of consequence to end it?  The man who extolled ‘the land of the free’ owned eight slaves when he died in 1843, but throughout his life he fought in court to free other slaves, and at one point did free six or seven of his own slaves.  Inquiring into the intent of “The Star-Spangled Banner” could lead to fascinating discussions about how we have chosen to interpret our nation’s principles (not to mention how a mark of punctuation can make a significant difference in meaning, as in the Second Amendment to the Constitution.) 

Living in the land of the free should not be a free ride, nor should patriotism be an empty word.  We would do well to heed JFK’s important advice: “Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country.”

_______________________________________________________

It’s worth noting that Key wrote three more stanzas, none of which ends with a question. One is ambiguous, the others proudly patriotic.  Here’s the end of the fourth and final stanza:

Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, 

And this be our motto – “In God is our trust,” 

And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave 

O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.